Inside the AI Bootcamps in Idaho Where Electricians Become Coders in 90 Days
A man with twenty years of experience wiring commercial buildings opened his laptop and started programming Python on a chilly Tuesday morning in Pocatello. Except for the occasional hum of a coffee maker and the gentle pounding of keys, the room was silent. He hadn’t worked with coding in three months.
He was currently troubleshooting a machine learning model.
These scenes are becoming remarkably prevalent throughout Idaho. Construction supervisors, mechanics, and electricians are signing up for 90-day AI boot programs that aim to transition them from manual crafts to digital creation at a shockingly efficient pace. The change is almost cinematic, but instead of taking place on glitzy campuses, it takes place in small classrooms and online dashboards.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Location | Idaho, United States |
| Program Duration | 90 days (approx. 11 weeks) |
| Target Audience | Career switchers (e.g. electricians, tradespeople, non-tech workers) |
| Offered By | Idaho State University, Idaho Technology Council, partner platforms |
| Instruction Style | Online and hybrid, instructor-led, hands-on labs |
| Core Focus | Software development, AI-assisted tools, coding fluency |
| Job Preparation | Career coaching, certifications, real-world project building |
| Student Outcome | Transition to tech careers, increased earning potential |
As labor markets changed and concerns about automation increased in recent years, Idaho institutions came up with a particularly creative solution. Programs run by Idaho State University and funded by the Idaho Technology Council started providing in-depth, practical training in AI and software for working adults rather than fresh graduates.
The idea is straightforward yet ambitious: over the course of 11 weeks, participants will learn how to create applications, distribute code, and engage with AI systems that function like a swarm of bees, continuously working, helping, improving, and proposing changes.
It has nothing to do with electrician replacement. It’s about extending the potential of an electrician.
It’s surprising how diverse the classrooms are. For small contractors, a former HVAC technician now creates scheduling software. An automated script is created by a diesel mechanic to expedite the ordering of parts. A single mother who used to oversee construction sites is now developing chatbots that enable nearby NGOs to reply to customer inquiries much more quickly.
These boot camps have a rigorous yet upbeat vibe. While instructors focus on the basics—logic, structure, and debugging—AI tools offer very flexible support by making recommendations, describing mistakes, and producing beginning code. Students learn how to work with AI systems in a highly efficient rhythm that reflects contemporary development processes, rather than creating hundreds of lines from start.
A participant called Caleb, who was still wearing steel-toed boots from his morning job, explained how he created a permit-tracking program for nearby contractors during one of the lab sessions I saw. His pride was very evident in his voice. He had expanded his trade rather than given it up.
That distinction is important.
Coding academies have been viewed with suspicion during the last ten years, especially when AI started automating several aspects of beginning programming. The viability of learning to code was questioned by critics. The response from Idaho has significantly improved: learn to work with AI rather than against it.
Leaders of boot camps talk candidly about this change. In order to streamline processes and free up human talent for design and decision-making, they urge students to view AI as a collaborator. Participants can create working products in weeks as opposed to years by utilizing real-time coding helpers and sophisticated analytics tools.
Before presenting her final project, a web application that organized volunteer schedules for a rural food bank, I witnessed a middle-aged student hesitating. The ovation felt well-earned when she concluded her explanation of how she improved database queries and incorporated APIs. The speed at which confidence may grow when given the correct resources quietly impressed me.
These programs are purposefully tough in their structure. Video lectures, live training, and practical laboratories occupy the days. Debugging obstinate faults frequently takes place at night. Although the workload is rigorous, it is surprisingly inexpensive when compared to regular degrees, so families who are unable to put life on hold for four years can take advantage of the chance.
The role of career services is especially advantageous. The curriculum incorporates employer networking events, resume seminars, and practice interviews. These bootcamps encourage students to create portfolios that show their ability to perform under duress rather than just awarding certificates.
For their part, employers are keeping a careful eye on things. The tech industry in Idaho has been growing quickly, and smaller businesses frequently have trouble finding personnel ready to move from coastal centers. Through the development of local programmers, the state fortifies its own ecosystem, revolutionizing sectors by automating processes while maintaining domestic opportunities.
Bootcamp graduates are joining positions at mid-sized software companies, governmental agencies, and agricultural technology startups through strategic partnerships. Others continue to practice their skills while incorporating automated techniques that greatly increase their enterprises’ speed and competitiveness.
One graduate explained how he redesigned his family’s irrigation monitoring system using AI, saving hours per week and minimizing the need for manual checks. His income has expanded gradually as a result of the technology’s exceptional dependability.
The bigger consequences are difficult to overlook. Finding technical knowledge without moving is frequently a problem for medium-sized enterprises in rural areas. High-level skills are now accessible in places that previously felt cut off from digital development thanks to these bootcamps, which successfully decentralize opportunity.
Sometimes skeptics wonder if 90 days is really enough. It is sufficient to become versed, to build, and to continue learning, instructors reply with practical honesty. Although momentum is created, mastery is still a quest.
This momentum alters one’s posture.
Technology is no longer viewed by participants as something that is forced upon them. They start to mold it. They test concepts. They interrogate vendors more incisively. They go from being software users to being software developers.
Though modest, the cultural shift is significant. Resilience and independence are qualities that Idaho has long cherished. These AI bootcamps translate that philosophy into digital form, demonstrating that creativity is not limited to areas outside of Silicon Valley. It calls for access, structure, and curiosity.
As AI develops over the next few years, initiatives like these might stop being experiments and instead serve as vital bridges. They show that when ambition meets mentorship and education meets pragmatism, transformation can be incredibly effective.
It is no longer unusual for a former electrician to write production code here. It’s turning into a blueprint.