Home Blog Page 997

‘Too big to fail’ banks under increasingly intense spotlight

0

Banking regulators are finalising new measures to deal with ‘too big to fail’ institutions as the finance sector continues to evolve and develop in the wake of the global economic crisis of 2008.

Chaired by Mark Carney, The Financial Stability Board (FSB) coordinates regulation across the Group of 20 economies (G20) and has its sights firmly set on the type of large banks which have been propped up by taxpayers in recent years.

Many hard working families have felt the brunt of the economic crisis, with welfare cuts and reductions of benefits in many developed nations, whilst large banks have been bailed out and supported by governments as they have sought to stabilise economies in uncertain times. Often senior bankers are perceived to have been rewarded for failure, whilst those on the margins of society have footed the bill.

Now Carney and the FSB are sharpening their tools as they look to mark a conclusion to the period of post-financial crisis ‘rule-changing’ which has damaged the image of the banking sector and weighed heavily on tax payers.

Ahead of a G20 summit next week, Carney stated in a letter to government leaders, “The financing capacity to the real economy is being rebuilt and significant retrenchment from international activity has been avoided. Countries must now put in place the legislative and regulatory frameworks for these tools to be used.”

In 2009 the FSB was asked by the G20 to introduce reforms to curtail bankers’ bonuses and increase bank capital requirements, whilst also shining a light on derivatives markets.

The Governor of the Bank of England, Carney has led the charge on behalf of the FSB to decrease the prolificacy of banks perceived to be “too big to fail”, which has been regarded as the last major post-crisis reform.

According to Reuters reporter Huw Jones, at next week’s G20 meeting in Turkey, leaders will be ‘asked to endorse a reform that requires the world’s 30 top banks to issue a buffer of bonds by 2019 that can be written down to raise funds equivalent to 18 percent of risk-weighted assets, if the lender goes bust. The buffer, known as total loss-absorbing capacity or TLAC, is in addition to the minimum core capital requirements a bank must already hold.’

The objective is to create a situation in which big banks which are not run well can fail without causing a financial meltdown in their national economy or in international markets. In other words, to avoid the kind of instability which occurred when the Lehman Brothers bank hit the rocks in 2008.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

Asda to take a cautious approach to Black Friday 2015

0

The UK’s second biggest supermarket Asda is reportedly scaling back on its Black Friday discounts for 2015 after chaotic scenes last year. In 2014 bargain hungry shoppers were seen fighting as they battled to get their hands on heavily discounted items such as televisions, whilst the big discounts and extra staffing costs meant gains for the retailer were not as big as had been hoped.

Black Friday frenzy has gripped the UK in recent years as retailers have aimed to replicate the huge commercial success of the post Thanksgiving weekend in the US. Indeed it has become known as the biggest shopping day of the year due to the massive flash discounts offered on many high price items in the run up to Christmas.

Asda are owned by the US retail giant Walmart and have previously taken a full on approach to Black Friday but last year saw disappointing sales from the day of discounts, with little or no boost to their grocery sales produced by dropping prices on toys and electronics.

In a report published by trade journal Retail Week and picked up by the Guardian newspaper it is claimed that Asda will consider an online-only approach to discounting goods or will spread deals out over a period of several days in an attempt to avoid stampedes in stores.

Last year Asda is believed to have registered two million sales between 8am and mid-afternoon on Black Friday, giving them their busiest single trading day of the year to that point. However, a source quoted by the Guardian commented, “Last year big-ticket items sold at a loss and attempts to ensure safety by forcing shoppers to queue for items meant food sales tanked.”

This year many businesses are focusing their Black Friday strategy on online sales, yet this too requires careful planning and has the potential to backfire. In 2014 the online shops of a number of large retailers including Currys and Marks & Spencer struggled with demand.

Meanwhile in the run up to Black Friday retailers are unclear on what the day could bring, even if massive numbers of transactions are expected. Argos have issued a profit warning after investing heavily on advertising and logistics whilst being unsure of the level of sales activity to expect.

In addition John Lewis predict 2015 Black Friday sales will increase 20% on last year’s figures, but also believe that the heavy demand for special offers can later disrupt consumer spending and profitability in the run up to Christmas.

Figures from Experian-IMRG for 2014 showed that the total five-week period of Christmas shopping in the UK saw £4bn spent, with £810m of that on Black Friday, £720m on Cyber Monday and £702m on Boxing Day. For 2015 those figures are expected to rise to £1.07bn on Black Friday, £943m on Cyber Monday and £856m on Boxing Day, meaning a colossal overall spend of £4.9bn over the total five-week period.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

TalkTalk begin to deal with fallout from latest security breach

0

Following the 21st October cyber attack on the UK’s telecoms company TalkTalk the firm’s management have been facing the press to allay fears of customers over potential future security problems.

The company’s chief executive Dido Harding believes the network’s cybersecurity is far more stringent than that of its competitors whilst reports have also emerged that the recent attack may have been less serious than previously reported.

Speaking to the Guardian newspaper in an in-depth interview, Harding commenting, “We are understandably the punchball for everybody wanting to make a point at the moment. Nobody is perfect. God knows, we’ve just demonstrated that our website security wasn’t perfect – I’m not going to pretend it is – but we take it incredibly seriously.”

“On that specific vulnerability, it’s much better than it was and we are head and shoulders better than some of our competitors and some of the media bodies that were throwing those particular stones.”

Unfortunately for Harding, TalkTalk have still been unable to calculate exactly how many of its database of four million customers had their privacy violated by last Wednesday’s attack, which saw clients’ personal data such as names, addresses and some bank account details taken. Harding stated that it is too early to say whether the company will offer customers compensation for having their data hacked, whilst the company insisted that the amount of information leaked was ‘materially lower than first feared’. The firm were held to ransom by the hackers before going public about the security breach but have not revealed whether they had paid up on the ransom demands.

Specialists from BAE Systems were reportedly called to step in and track down the cyber criminals, whilst staff from Scotland Yard’s cybercrime team are on the case. The company are also unable to guarantee that another attack would be prevented and this is not the first time TalkTalk’s networks have been hacked.

About the possibility of future attacks Harding told the Guardian, “It would be naive to say something like this will never happen again to any business. Digital safety is no different to physical safety. You can do your upmost to minimise it. You can arm yourself to protect yourself, but in the end there are criminals everywhere and that’s the way of the world. It’s usually tempting to say there will never ever be another attack but that would be naive.”

Industry analysts have openly criticised TalkTalk’s security systems in the past and say that the company’s reacted slowly and poorly to breaches, failing to encrypt and make data secure.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

UK Government generates over £590 with sale of remaining Royal Mail share

0

The Government of the United Kingdom has authorised the sale of its last remaining share of the Royal Mail, generating £591.1 in the process.

The news was confirmed on Tuesday (13th October) as the Government sold off the remainder of its stake in the national network to institutional investors. The stake was 13% of the overall share of Royal Mail, whilst in a gesture of goodwill a remaining 1% stake was gifted to eligible Royal Mail staff in the UK.

The sale spells an end to the Government’s involvement in the operation of the

postal system which boasts 500 years of history. The privatisation process was really set in motion two years ago, sparking criticism from political opponents of David Cameron’s Tory coalition with the Liberal Democrats at that time.

Critics suggested that the Royal Mail had been sold of too cheaply, with trade unions supporting that argument.

But the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has continued the privatisation process, which culminated in Tuesday’s news of the final stake being sold off. In total the privatisation was generated proceeds of £3.3bn, with the delivery operator now fully controlled by private management for the first time in more than five centuries of operation.

Sajid Javid, Secretary of State for Business, stated, “This is a truly historic day for Royal Mail with the workers gaining a share of this history. We have delivered on our promise to sell the Government’s entire remaining stake which means that for the very first time the company is now wholly owned by its employees and private investors. This is the right step for the Royal Mail, its customers and the taxpayer. Proceeds will also go to help pay off the national debt – a crucial part of our long-term plan to provide economic security for working people.”

Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne added, “By fully leaving state ownership we have a win all round – for customers, the workforce and the taxpayer. And every penny will be used to pay down our national debt as we continue to bring our public finances under control. Once again, we are also going to recognise the hard work of the staff who have done a great job in turning the company around, and give them a 1% stake to share between them.”

A government statement also explained, ‘There is no policy need for government to hold shares in Royal Mail, as the universal postal service remains well protected by law and by Ofcom. Post Office Ltd, which operates the network of branches throughout the UK, remains wholly-owned by government and was separated from Royal Mail in April 2012.’

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

Macduff Shellfish to be acquired in £98.4m deal

0

Macduff Shellfish Group (“Macduff”), one of Europe’s leading wild caught shellfish processors, has entered into an agreement for 100% of the assets of Macduff to be acquired by Canadian-based Clearwater Seafoods (“Clearwater”) for £98.4m from the Beaton family and Change Capital Partners, the specialist pan-European private equity fund.

Based in Mintlaw, near Peterhead in Scotland, Macduff has factories in Mintlaw, Stornoway and Exeter and owns and operates 14 mid-shore scallop harvesting vessels from its Dumfries facility.  It employs approximately 400 people at the seasonal peak, specialising in scallops, langoustine, whelk and crab.

Nova Scotia-based Clearwater is one of North America’s largest vertically integrated seafood companies, employing approximately 1,400 people, delivering premium wild seafood including scallops, lobster, clams, coldwater shrimp, crab and groundfish.

The deal brings Macduff access to new markets, investment and opportunities for growth.  For Clearwater, the acquisition of Macduff provides access to market leading supply in key markets and channels along with a well-established brand, UK-based harvesting and processing expertise, a strong management team and a talented workforce.

Under the deal Macduff will retain its name and operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Clearwater, sharing resources and best practice between the businesses. Current Chairman Euan Beaton will become President of Macduff and Managing Director Roy Cunningham, will assume the role of Vice President.

Euan Beaton, Chairman of Macduff Shellfish, said: “Having reached our goal of building a £52m business, we had one suitor in mind which shares our vision and values to enable us to accelerate our growth on a global scale.  With a similar vertically integrated business model, sustainability at its heart, sound employee practices and strong relationships with fishermen but operating on a much bigger scale, Clearwater is an ideal fit for Macduff.

“This deal is great news for our operations in the UK, bringing investment and access to new markets within an extremely successful and respected business.  It provides learning and development opportunities for our staff as we share best practice with Clearwater and it gives fishermen access to more markets.”

Ian Smith, CEO of Clearwater said, “The acquisition of Macduff brings together two of the world’s leading and fastest growing vertically integrated wild shellfish harvesters. The transaction will allow Clearwater to integrate its vessel management and sustainable harvesting practices, innovative processing technologies along with its global sales, marketing and distribution footprint into Macduff; a company that already possesses a talented management team, excellent resource assets and a strong presence in Europe, the world’s largest and most valuable seafood market.  Our companies have been building a working relationship for more than three years and we are confident Macduff represents a highly attractive investment with a strong strategic fit for Clearwater.”

Steven Petrow, Partner at Change Capital Partners, said: “When we invested in Macduff in 2011 there was a compelling opportunity to transform the business through international expansion and strategic acquisitions. Thanks to our highly successful partnership with the Beaton family and Management we have delivered on all fronts and are incredibly proud of Macduff’s achievements.  This has been a very successful investment and we are convinced that the next chapter in the company’s history will be very exciting.”

Macduff was advised by Burness Paul, KPMG and Anderson Anderson & Brown.

Struggling retailer Tesco announces drop in profits

0

It may seem an exaggeration to describe British supermarket chain Tesco as ‘struggling’ as they announce underlying profits of £354m for the first half of the financial year, but considering that figure was £779m for the same period in 2014, the firm has seen a 55% decrease in profitability.

The pre-tax profit figure tells a healthier story at £74m, compared with a £19m loss for the same period in 2014. Meanwhile like-for-like sales have dropped 1.1% in the UK, but overall sales volume has risen 1.4% and the total number of transactions at Tesco in the first half of its financial year are also up 1.5%.

So what does all this really mean? The answer is somewhat complex, but the Tesco chief executive Dave Lewis who arrived from Unilever just over a year ago is rebuilding the company after they announced the worst results in their history in April. Those results showed a record pre-tax loss for the financial year to the end of February of £6.4bn.

Lewis has adopted a strategy of putting pressure on profits in the short term by introducing widespread price cuts and increasing the number of staff on the shop floor, to attempt to attract customers back.

Tesco have sold their South Korean Homeplus stores and reduced their overall debt by £4.2 billion in the process, but they have also confirmed that to meet the UK government’s potential National Living Wage of £9 an hour for workers by 2020 it will cost them about £500m.

Interviewed about the latest set of results by the BBC, Mr Lewis commented, “If I compare it to the second half of last year, the first half of this year feels like we’ve made some progress. We obviously had some issues to deal with, we dealt with them. It meant that in the second half of last year we made no profit whatsoever in the UK.”

“Our sales are growing compared to where they were either a year ago, or indeed in the second half of last year and we’ve generated some profit as we rebuild the profitability of Tesco business.”

Tesco’s announcement of poor results come shortly after competitor Sainsbury’s predicted rosier than anticipated full year profits.

The UK supermarket scene is an ultra competitive landscape. In relative terms sales are still dominated by the big four supermarkets Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s, Tesco, who had a combined market share of 73.2% of the UK grocery sector in the quarter ending 4th January 2015.

That is a small decrease from 74.1% in 2007, but the ‘big four’ are coming under increasing pressure from discount retailers such as Aldi and Lidl.

Tesco plan to strike back with additional price cuts, after this week’s announcement of their underlying profits essentially dropping by more than half in the first six months of the financial year.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

Volkswagen counting cost of emissions scandal

0

Following the global Volkswagen scandal prosecutors in Germany have commenced an investigation into the “allegations of fraud in the sale of cars with manipulated emissions data”, with former Volkswagen chief executive Martin Winterkorn reportedly facing criminal charges.

Winterkorn resigned last week, after nearly a decade leading the world’s largest automakers, insisting at the time of his resignation that he had no knowledge of the deliberate manipulation of emissions results in more than 11 million diesel-engine vehicles produced by the company.

Regulators in the United States discovered “cheat” software in some VW built diesel engines which lowered emissions when cars were being inspected.

Several parties – apparently even including VW themselves – have raised official complaints about the matter to prosecutors in Braunschweig, near the company’s HQ in Wolfsburg.

The number one global carmaker in terms of absolute sales have apparently set aside €6.5bn to deal with the fallout of the scandal but some experts believe VW could face up to $18bn in potential fines.

The former boss of VW owned brand Porsche, Matthias Mueller, was announced as the successor to Winterkorn on Friday. The revelations about the deliberately deceptive emissions software have rocked the European car industry and senior VW executives have been called to Brussels for discussions with senior EU officials.

VW owned brand Audi say more than two million of its cars are fitted with the software worldwide, mostly in Europe but also in the United States. Several news agencies have reporting that VW has suspended senior Research & Development directors across its family of brands, including Audi and Porsche.

Volkswagen shares have lost about 35% of their value since the manufacturer acknowledged wrongdoing in the US emissions tests. In addition to potential fines from authorities across the world, senior staff are facing potential lawsuits from clients and shareholders.

Investigations have also been initiated in Italy, France and South Korea, whilst authorities in Switzerland have even temporarily banned the sale of diesel-engine VW vehicles. The company have been told to recall more than half a million vehicles in the U.S. and sales have been suspended there.

Owners of VW vehicles have been advised by U.S. regulators that their cars are safe to drive, but ultimately the cars involved need to be repaired by mechanics in order to pass emissions tests with the benefit of the ‘cheat software.’

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

Apple undertakes App Store clean-up following malware attack in China

0

US tech giant Apple has admitted it is undertaking work to counter breaches of the App Store, after malware code was added to a number of apps for iPads and iPhones which are popular in China.

Apple, who earlier this year reported the biggest quarterly profit ever by a public company when a net profit of approx £12bn was reported in the fiscal first quarter, has generally been regarded as producing security tight platforms and products, so this attack comes as something of a surprise.

The attack is believed to be the first large-scale attack the App Store, after hackers produced a fake version of Apple’s iOS app-building software, which was promoted to developers to download. Apps created with the software allowed leaking of app-user data, with the information being sent back to the hackers’ servers.

The malware also prompted users to reveal passwords and additional data through fake alerts on infected apps and devices. The apps affected were typical mass consumption apps such as an Uber-style taxi app, a music download management app and the WeChat app developed by Tencent.

Most of the apps were only available in China and most users affected were Chinese, but some affected apps are also available outside China.

A spokesperson for Apple, Christine Monaghan, stated that apps created with the malicious software, called XcodeGhost, were now eliminated. She commented, “We are working with the developers to make sure they’re using the proper version of Xcode to rebuild their apps.”

For years the stability of Apple’s devices has been one of the company’s core strengths with their MacBook computers, in addition to their handheld devices, hailed by users for their consistently well performing operating systems.

computerworld.com recently said of the new iOS 9, “Apple’s free update to its mobile OS, delivers relevant information, smarter search, better security and much needed stability.” Such plaudits have long been commonplace for the California based tech giant, but this weekend’s Chinese attack shows that no-one is immune to cyber security issues.

The App Store is generally regarded as a secure marketplace as the barrier to entry is kept high by Apple and instances of malware on iOS apps have occurred.

However, on this occasion both Apple and the Chinese iOS app developers have been caught out.

Reacting to the attack Wee Teck Loo, head of consumer electronics at market research firm Euromonitor International, told the BBC he did not expect it to have any significant impact on Apple’s product sales.

“It is definitely embarrassing for Apple but the reality is that malware is a persistent problem since the days of PCs and the problem will multiply as the number of mobile devices explodes from 1.4 billion units in 2015 to 1.8 billion in 2020,” he commented.

Apple will hope this is a blip and will continue to maintain their undoubtedly high standards. Their aforementioned record Q1 profit of approximately £11.8bn ($18bn) is the biggest in history for a public company, beating the $15.9bn made by ExxonMobil in Q2 of 2012.

The company recently revealed their new iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus, which are officially launched for sale on 25th September. The pre-order period commenced on 12th September after the new phones were unveiled earlier in the previous week.

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

Catalan businesses divided over talk of split from Spain

0

Forthcoming local elections in Spain’s North Eastern region of Catalonia on 27th September are being viewed as a de facto opinion poll on a theoretical independence push, though the voting public and business leaders are clearly undivided on the matter.

Catalonia is a relatively prosperous area compared to some parts of Spain though it too has suffered with political corruption issues and a slow economy since the global financial crisis. During this period of austerity a Catalan independence movement has grown louder, yet they have never truly been able to demonstrate that a majority of their population are in favour of independence – the polls swing back and forth.

However, with its own language and a strong cultural identity, some Catalans feel they are not Spanish and they also feel unfairly treated by the central government in Madrid when it comes to taxation and the subsequent re-distribution of wealth.

In short, some Catalans feel they put in more than they get out and some would even prefer to be worse off than be dictated to by the rest of Spain. One major issue that pro-independence Catalan politicians have is that they have been unable to get a clear majority behind them and are unable to form a sensible dialogue with the Spanish government on the matter, though not for lack of trying.

The upcoming elections may change that if the population demonstrates a clear appetite for a split from Spain. Even if the pro-independence parties do gain more power, it is unclear what their way forward will be in legal and constitutional terms.

One key issue is that Catalan businesses have widely varied views on the situation. Some politicians in Barcelona and those aligned with the Catalan president Artur Mas believe Catalonia can split from Spain yet remain within the EU.

British Prime Minister David Cameron ought to be aware of the implications of testing EU legislation given his sometimes choppy relationship with the union, but at a recent press conference with his Spanish counterpart Mariano Rajoy in Madrid he commented, “If part of a state secedes, it’s no longer part of the EU and has to take its place at the back of the queue behind other countries applying to become members. Just like the UK, Spain is a great country with a long and proud history, and if I had a message, it would be the same as the one in the UK, that we are better off together.”

The respected Catalan business group, Foment del Treball, recently noted that a theoretical new independent Catalonia would not be a part of the European Union.

The Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel also recently expressed similar opinions, whilst U.S. President Barack Obama highlighted his opposition to the ambition of some Catalans to break away, after his talks with Spain’s King Felipe VI on 15th September, stating, “As a matter of foreign policy, we are deeply committed to maintaining a relationship with a strong and unified Spain.”

In response, the pro-independence bloc in Catalonia insist these statements are being provoked by Rajoy and Spanish government to sway sentiment against them. They believe Catalonia, with its industrial past, excellent trade links with Europe, modernised infrastructure and productive micro-economy can survive and prosper without Spain.

The separatists claim an independent Catalonia could have GDP per capita higher than the European average, have lower taxes and more generous pensions. They believe as a nation they could post a surplus of €11.5 billion euros per annum. The autonomous region already produces a fifth of Spain’s economic output.

Clearly no-one can prove that viability before any potential split. Catalonia has no military, relatively little access to natural resources and is highly dependent on the rest of Spain in terms of exports, with over 40% of its trade being with the rest of Spain. Meanwhile the powerful Catalan banking sector relies heavily on business with the rest of the country.

Nonetheless, if the separatist succeed at the ballot box on 27th September president Mas has pledged to create an 18-month roadmap to secession.

Many local business leaders have kept quiet on the issue due to concerns over causing offence to their fellow Catalans or local government. One exception to that trend is the president of Freixenet, Jose Luis Bonet, whose company are a leading producer of sparkling wine.

He recently told AFP, “a unilateral declaration of independence would be a disaster for the Catalan economy.”

In addition this week, statements from Cercle d’Economía, a prominent collective of Catalan businessmen and economists, described their opposition to the proposed roadmap to a unilateral declaration of independence even in the case of a majority in the regional parliament for the separatists.

The Cercle d’Economía acknowledge that they are concerned about the ‘economic, financial and investment’ implication the election result could produce for Catalonia. Their statement read, “As we have said in previous opinions, we do not support unilateral declarations that put the principle of legality and belonging to the European Union and the euro at risk.”

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0

FFP proves effective as 15 Champions League clubs curb spending in 2015

0

One of Spain’s biggest secondary ticket market platforms Ticketbis.net have revealed that Manchester City were the biggest spenders out of this seasons Champions’ League Group Stage participants as well as being top of the Champions League ‘Net Spend Table’ on transfers in 2015.

City are followed by Ligue 1 champions PSG and Spanish side Valencia who had to qualify for this seasons competition through a play-off victory over PSG’s French counterparts Monaco. However, despite some of the major net spends of some of Europe’s elite in 2015, 15 of the 32 teams in this seasons competition had a negative net spend for the year, highlighting that many of the sides are taking a prudent approach towards spending despite FFP rules being relaxed in recent times.

Many of the teams in Europe’s biggest club competition have shied away from spending huge figures in 2015  due to the effects Financial Fair Play may have on them, with penalties including a potential eight figure fine and squad deductions for next seasons European competitions if they were to qualify. Even teams who have spent large amounts on transfers in the past including the likes of Zenit St.Petersburg, Shakhtar Donetsk and Galatasaray have been unable to loosen their purse strings significantly  in 2015.

AS Roma were penalised by UEFA over FFP in May this year and have an overall net spend of minus £27.7 million. In this summer’s transfer window they’ve had to resort to signing players on loan instead of purchasing them outright, with the most notable loan signings being Manchester City’s Edin Dzeko and Arsenal goalkeeper Wojciech Szczęsny.

Not surprisingly, Portuguese sides Benfica and FC Porto are the two sides in this seasons Champion’s League competition with the lowest net spend in 2015. As both sides continue to develop highly talented footballers from both their homeland and South America, the big sides in Europe’s most coveted leagues such as the Premier League and La Liga continue to invest in the league’s biggest talents for astronomical fees. The most high profile departure from the Portuguese Superliga in 2015 was FC Porto’s Columbian forward Jackson Martinez who joined Spanish giants Atletico Madrid for an estimated £25.5 million.

Manchester City are way out ahead with regard to money spent in 2015, spending £175m on new signings, including the £51m signing of Wolfsburg’s Kevin De Bruyne and the £44m acquisition of England international Raheem Sterling. They have also acquired Fabian Delph, Nicolas Otamendi and Wilfried Bony this year and whilst they have recouped just over £50m by selling players their net spend is the highest in Europe at £124.7 million.

City are one of six teams in the Champions League to break their transfer record in 2015 along with Wolfsburg, Porto, Valencia, Maccabi Tel Aviv and FC Astana.

Like City, PSG have also highlighted their confidence in avoiding further FFP punishment with a net spend of £71.8 million in 2015, as they too aim to achieve European success on the back of their domestic progress.

Unsurprisingly, City’s neighbours Manchester United are also one of the competition’s biggest spenders in 2015 as Louis Van Gaal’s rebuilding continues with momentum. However, United were able to recoup just over £73 million on players in the two 2015 transfer windows and were second to Benfica in terms of total money received from transfers.

Despite being under a transfer embargo, Barcelona have a total net spend of £10.8 million due the acquisitions of Arda Turan and Alexis Vidal and the departure of versatile forward Pedro. The Catalan club fell well behind the biggest spenders in Spain, Valencia, who have a total net spend of £71.8 million in 2015 as they look to make ground in Europe again, having overcome financial difficulties in recent years. Meanwhile, Real Madrid have not spent as heavily as in previous years.

FC Astana and Maccabi Tel Aviv are the only participants outside of UEFA’s top six ranked leagues to have a positive net spend in 2015.

Irene Recio from Ticketbis.net, who commissioned the study, commented, “The Champions League is club football’s elite competition so it’s no surprise that some of the world’s biggest teams are continuing to flex their muscles in the transfer market as they strive for European glory. For Manchester City and PSG the Champions League trophy is certainly the next step if they are to be regarded as two of the world’s biggest clubs and the net spend figures show they are certainly going for it.”

champions league table

Featured Image – Source / CC 2.0 

  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 114,364.00 1.1%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 4,285.42 4.29%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 2.88 4.28%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 1,028.10 3.71%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 230.84 4.06%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.999604 0.01%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 4,281.06 4.3%
  • tronTRON (TRX) $ 0.339874 1.77%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.848386 5.56%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 31.38 5.1%
  • the-open-networkToncoin (TON) $ 2.98 3.36%
Enable Notifications OK No thanks